Monthly Archives: April 2011

Who’s to say whether a juror has bias? (part 2)

In the previous post, I ruminated on the fact that each juror gets scrutinized for bias, even after pledging their neutrality. Again, there are reasons for doing so, but the near-presumption of bias goes unquestioned. To see how far this … Continue reading

Posted in Jury structure and reform, Public/media views of juries, Summoning juries, Voir dire and jury selection | Leave a comment

Who’s to say whether a juror has bias? (Part 1)

The voir dire process that juries go through in the U.S. helps attorneys detect juror bias against their case. Attorneys often use “peremptory strikes” to remove jurors without having to state a reason (or “cause”), but sometimes the jurors don’t … Continue reading

Posted in Jury structure and reform, Public/media views of juries, Voir dire and jury selection | Leave a comment

Reflections on a brief stint as juror

Jerry Large, a columnist for my local newspaper, The Seattle Times, just served a brief stint in jury duty and reflects on it in this morning’s edition. For Large, the experience caused him to reflect on the larger context–how special … Continue reading

Posted in Deliberation on juries, Verdicts juries reach | Leave a comment